It's quite nice and the text goes with the genre
however, I feel a bit trippy looking at it, there's colour then there's one
random part of the digipak which is black and white
This is the least proffesional of all the digipacks. I
think there is no clear theme and all of the slides feel random.
James Colouers digipack is sticking with the theme
"coloeur" rench for colour because there is a lot of colour. I think that the cd
looks good. But the colours everywhere make it look really childish and
unproffesional. I think maybe you should just have each oage a different colour
rather than having so many different colours on every page.
Good varioty of different pictures, however the front
cover could include bright colours so it would fit in with the rest of the
digipack.
WWW: the guitar page EBI: Pretty much a waste of my
time doing this 1) remove the 1st one as its a copy of posig 2) you go from
black and white to all colours of the rainbow needs continuity 3) It generally
looks just bad start again and get some hd photos of jams keep with colourful or
b/w choose one and get some better fonts!
top left is an ABSOLUTE RIP OFF FROM POSCIG, FIX IT OR
GET 0 MARKS. pikey estate
The james couleur digipaki is very plain. it doesnt
look very professinal because of all the colours that are used are a bit
overloaded. If the layout was all based on one or two different colours it could
look more professinal. The fonts that are used work well with the images that
have been taken, The images all look professinal.
Love the entire top row of this, the composition,
imagery and colour scheme are fab, but not sure how the last two panels fit in
????? The CD is pretty cool but why the long white background? The guitars look
like they've been found on google, maybe go up to music and get your own
pictures of instruments.
I'm really sorry but I dislike the colours and the
font. Looks a little 'childish' however my opinion might change when I see the
video and have a better understanding of the singer. Would like to have seen the
aritsts face clearer, but then I guess this makes its quite secretive. However I
do really like the effort done into the editing.
This is a good attempt but it needs work. There is a
lot of colour which means it captures the eye but the images are bad quality and
don't look very professional. Higher quality images and some more professional
shots would improve the final product.
although i love the colours and theme of the digipack i
dont understand why the guitars are there.. it doesnt fit
The black and white picture and the pictures of the
guitar do not go with the rest of the digipak being so colourful it looks like
two different digipak's have been put together, there should be a constant
colour theme throughout.
i don't see the theme for their digipak i like the
pictures
Looks like it was done quickly/not quite finished Some
is colourful and some is black and white, doesn't keep continuity
Unprofessional and cheesy, i.e. the repeated guitars,
heavy-handed filters and lack on contrast. DOESN'T LOOK INDIE!
it's good that they've linked the idea of james'
surname to the theme of rainbows and bright colours. this led me to be confused
about the black and white section - is this deliberate? there are three sections
of very bright colours and two sections of plain, duller colours which is
confusing. i love the CD though, the use of coloured smoke or dust is a great
touch.
Nice idea to do lots of different colours, the font is
appropriate and works well. Improvements: it looks really unprofessional and
quite childish, make it so it works with an older audience a bit more
Consolidated feedback:
- keep to one colour scheme, rather than trying to fuse colour and black and white images together
- cut down on the heavy use of the mixed colours
- potentially chose another font - mixed opinions
- make it less of a 'pikey estate'
- get more inspiration from other artists digi packs as it 'DOESN'T LOOK INDIE!'
- cut down on the 'childish' look of the pack
- and try not to waste our peers time : 'Pretty much a waste of my time doing this'
No comments:
Post a Comment